Happy New Year to all Canadians and Liberals! 2006 has been a year of necessary change that will improve Canada as a country.
2007 will be a year of hope for us Liberals. We must stand united against this Conservative government with its hidden agenda.
I believe in 2007 we will see:
More Conservative talk of economic and financial stability that is simply riding the coat tails of years of Liberal budgets.
An Environmental plan that will benefit none.
The Conservatives try to spin their performance so it seems like they actually do what is right for Canadians.
And a Liberal government.
Only, if we actually campaign, and don't screw up like we did last time.
We must learn from our mistakes, so we can rebuild our Canada.
Sunday, December 31, 2006
Saturday, October 28, 2006
"Super Weekend" Analysis
With nearly a month passed since the delegate elections happened, I want to examine what happened. To start, the delegate results are as follows (with ex-officio):
Ignatieff: 1,471 (28.2%)
Rae: 947 (18.2%)
Kennedy: 825 (15.8%)
Dion:784 (15%)
Dryden: 231 (4.4%)
Volpe: 218 (4.2%)
Brison: 185 (3.6%)
Martha Hall Findlay: 41 (0.8%)
As we can see, the top two candidates are among the worst people to lead the party. How idiotic is it that one of the top contenders would be the leader of a party who only joined the party not even a year ago. Am I the only one that finds something wrong with this? Ignatieff is just totally wrong and unliberal on so many topics. I can only hope that the delegates for the candidates begin supporting Dion with support leaving Rae and Ignatieff.
The actual voting was an embaressment. It took over a week to get atleast two thirds of the results available to the general public. The party needs to modernize it's voting system.
Ignatieff: 1,471 (28.2%)
Rae: 947 (18.2%)
Kennedy: 825 (15.8%)
Dion:784 (15%)
Dryden: 231 (4.4%)
Volpe: 218 (4.2%)
Brison: 185 (3.6%)
Martha Hall Findlay: 41 (0.8%)
As we can see, the top two candidates are among the worst people to lead the party. How idiotic is it that one of the top contenders would be the leader of a party who only joined the party not even a year ago. Am I the only one that finds something wrong with this? Ignatieff is just totally wrong and unliberal on so many topics. I can only hope that the delegates for the candidates begin supporting Dion with support leaving Rae and Ignatieff.
The actual voting was an embaressment. It took over a week to get atleast two thirds of the results available to the general public. The party needs to modernize it's voting system.
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Why Ignatieff is bad for the Liberal Party
It has come as a suprise to me that Michael Ignatieff has been able to gain so much support within the party. For a man that has relatively nothing at all to do with the Liberal party for the last three decades, why is he qualified to lead it? His stance on many issues would give a blurred choice between the parties during an election. He is for the continuation for the Afghanistan mission which is heavily favored by the Conservatives. Potential anti-war or people simply against this mission would have no choice but to vote NDP.
What the Liberal party needs is a strong leader that has the experience and ideas to make us Canada's government. Ignatieff is not the person to do this. Already he has shown that he cannot stand against minor attacks from other Liberals during debates and the fact he is already making apologies for things he has said is a sign that he should not lead. The Liberals have enough scandals in our past, and we don't need a new leader coming in with any.
A Liberal party run by Michael Ignatieff is not a party that will be able to create a majority government. Electing him as leader will be handing that position to the Conservatives.
What the Liberal party needs is a strong leader that has the experience and ideas to make us Canada's government. Ignatieff is not the person to do this. Already he has shown that he cannot stand against minor attacks from other Liberals during debates and the fact he is already making apologies for things he has said is a sign that he should not lead. The Liberals have enough scandals in our past, and we don't need a new leader coming in with any.
A Liberal party run by Michael Ignatieff is not a party that will be able to create a majority government. Electing him as leader will be handing that position to the Conservatives.
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Franklin Graham in Winnipeg

The recent arrival of Franklin Graham in my hometown of Winnipeg has got me interested. The biggest newspaper in Manitoba did an interview with Mr.Graham in which he called Hinduism a Satanist religion. I'm all for freedom of speech, but sometimes people take it a bit too far. Mr.Graham has every right to practice his religion and so does everyone else. When you gain an ethnocentric view of your religion, your going to end up looking like an idiot. Mr.Graham should perhaps consider why he must condemn all other religions besides Christianity and adopt a more welcoming point of view. For someone with so much influence, he could do much more with a better attitude.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Immigration: An issue that needs attention
Immigration. Such a vital part of Canada is not getting the attention it deserves. One of Canada's Government's top priorities should be having a much more comprehensive Immigration strategy. Often, fully qualified immigrants with MDs and BAs are not recognized in Canada. When we have a shortage of doctors in many rural areas, why are these people overlooked? Anybody that has taken schooling in medicine for a dozen years can write a basic prescription no matter where they come from. All of the parties need to make this a central goal. Since so many Canadians were at one time immigrants and this entire country is basically built around it, we need a far better system.
Afghanistan War
Canada's role in Afghanistan has largely changed since we first began our mission. We are at crossroads of continuing to be more involved in combat based missions or peace/rebuilding missions. Regardless, a comprehensive debate needs to be called. This Conservative government wants to hide behind the slogan of supporting the troops to continue with more intense fighting. He is making it seem that if you're anti-war, then you are against the troops. This is completely wrong. Canada needs to determine what it's full role in Afghanistan will be. Other NATO countries may need to begin to takeover some of the missions we have been doing. This idea of the Canadians and the Americans having to do the hard work while the other NATO countries do restructuring missions is unacceptable. We need to face the facts; the Afghan mission needs to be revised and debated so we can head toward a more safer Afghanistan and Canada.
Saturday, October 21, 2006
Most Idiotic Conservative of the Month - Rona Ambrose
Where to begin on this one......this joke of an Environment Minister (How can you even have an Environment Minister from Alberta) is doing shit for the environment. Her Clean Air Act is the most pathetic thing to come out of this government yet. It sets goals for 2050. By then, half of the coastlines in the world could be under water due to ocean levels rising. They want to talk for 4 years with motor and industrial companies. What kind of bullshit is that? You create a few new laws to get things done and if big business doesn't like it, who cares? It's law, and they have to follow it. By the time this act begins to act, this Conservative government will be long gone. Already all three opposition parties have decided to vote against this bill, but I guess that is Conservative progress for you.
Why I support Stephane Dion
I support Stephane Dion to be the next leader of the Liberal Party. Why? Dion is the only candidate running that has a clear and concise liberal agenda on all of the hot topics. He is the only one of the candidates with a comprehensive global warming strategy. He deserves the title of Prime Minister of Canada.
Just compare him to the other candidates: Ignatieff, a man who hasn't even been in Canada for 30 years and has no political experience; Rae, who hasn't even been a Liberal for even a year yet feels he should lead it; and Kennedy, who just can't stand out from being a plain, boring guy.
And this speech alone proves this point:
Just compare him to the other candidates: Ignatieff, a man who hasn't even been in Canada for 30 years and has no political experience; Rae, who hasn't even been a Liberal for even a year yet feels he should lead it; and Kennedy, who just can't stand out from being a plain, boring guy.
And this speech alone proves this point:
Welcome to my blog!
Hello and welcome to my blog, Central Grit. As a young liberal living in the heart of Canada I will try to give an interesting and unique view on Canadian politics.
I invite you to post comments here as often as you like so that we can debate and discuss current issues.
Thanks for reading!
I invite you to post comments here as often as you like so that we can debate and discuss current issues.
Thanks for reading!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





